检索增强生成

Universal

rag

by giuseppe-trisciuoglio

聚合向量数据库、语义检索与提示注入的 RAG 实践范式,适合搭建文档问答、知识库助手和外部知识驱动的 AI 应用,提升回答准确性并减少幻觉。

271AI 与智能体未扫描2026年3月5日

安装

claude skill add --url github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/tree/main/plugins/developer-kit-ai/skills/rag

文档

RAG Implementation

Build Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems that extend AI capabilities with external knowledge sources.

Overview

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) enhances AI applications by retrieving relevant information from knowledge bases and incorporating it into AI responses, reducing hallucinations and providing accurate, grounded answers.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Building Q&A systems over proprietary documents
  • Creating chatbots with current, factual information
  • Implementing semantic search with natural language queries
  • Reducing hallucinations with grounded responses
  • Enabling AI systems to access domain-specific knowledge
  • Building documentation assistants
  • Creating research tools with source citation
  • Developing knowledge management systems

Instructions

Step 1: Choose Vector Database

Select an appropriate vector database based on your requirements:

  1. For production scalability: Use Pinecone or Milvus
  2. For open-source requirements: Use Weaviate or Qdrant
  3. For local development: Use Chroma or FAISS
  4. For hybrid search needs: Use Weaviate with BM25 support

Step 2: Select Embedding Model

Choose an embedding model based on your use case:

  1. General purpose: text-embedding-ada-002 (OpenAI)
  2. Fast and lightweight: all-MiniLM-L6-v2
  3. Multilingual support: e5-large-v2
  4. Best performance: bge-large-en-v1.5

Step 3: Implement Document Processing Pipeline

  1. Load documents from your source (file system, database, API)
  2. Clean and preprocess documents (remove formatting artifacts, normalize text)
  3. Split documents into chunks using appropriate chunking strategy
  4. Generate embeddings for each chunk
  5. Store embeddings in your vector database with metadata

Step 4: Configure Retrieval Strategy

  1. Dense Retrieval: Use semantic similarity via embeddings for most use cases
  2. Hybrid Search: Combine dense + sparse retrieval for better coverage
  3. Metadata Filtering: Add filters based on document attributes
  4. Reranking: Implement cross-encoder reranking for high-precision requirements

Step 5: Build RAG Pipeline

  1. Create content retriever with your embedding store
  2. Configure AI service with retriever and chat memory
  3. Implement prompt template with context injection
  4. Add response validation and grounding checks

Step 6: Evaluate and Optimize

  1. Measure retrieval metrics (precision@k, recall@k, MRR)
  2. Evaluate answer quality (faithfulness, relevance)
  3. Monitor performance and user feedback
  4. Iterate on chunking, retrieval, and prompt parameters

Examples

Example 1: Basic Document Q&A System

java
// Simple RAG setup for document Q&A
List<Document> documents = FileSystemDocumentLoader.loadDocuments("/docs");

InMemoryEmbeddingStore<TextSegment> store = new InMemoryEmbeddingStore<>();
EmbeddingStoreIngestor.ingest(documents, store);

DocumentAssistant assistant = AiServices.builder(DocumentAssistant.class)
    .chatModel(chatModel)
    .contentRetriever(EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.from(store))
    .build();

String answer = assistant.answer("What is the company policy on remote work?");

Example 2: Metadata-Filtered Retrieval

java
// RAG with metadata filtering for specific document categories
EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever retriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.builder()
    .embeddingStore(store)
    .embeddingModel(embeddingModel)
    .maxResults(5)
    .minScore(0.7)
    .filter(metadataKey("category").isEqualTo("technical"))
    .build();

Example 3: Multi-Source RAG Pipeline

java
// Combine multiple knowledge sources
ContentRetriever webRetriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.from(webStore);
ContentRetriever docRetriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.from(docStore);

List<Content> results = new ArrayList<>();
results.addAll(webRetriever.retrieve(query));
results.addAll(docRetriever.retrieve(query));

// Rerank and return top results
List<Content> topResults = reranker.reorder(query, results).subList(0, 5);

Example 4: RAG with Chat Memory

java
// Conversational RAG with context retention
Assistant assistant = AiServices.builder(Assistant.class)
    .chatModel(chatModel)
    .chatMemory(MessageWindowChatMemory.withMaxMessages(10))
    .contentRetriever(retriever)
    .build();

// Multi-turn conversation with context
assistant.chat("Tell me about the product features");
assistant.chat("What about pricing for those features?");  // Maintains context

Use this skill when:

  • Building Q&A systems over proprietary documents
  • Creating chatbots with current, factual information
  • Implementing semantic search with natural language queries
  • Reducing hallucinations with grounded responses
  • Enabling AI systems to access domain-specific knowledge
  • Building documentation assistants
  • Creating research tools with source citation
  • Developing knowledge management systems

Core Components

Vector Databases

Store and efficiently retrieve document embeddings for semantic search.

Key Options:

  • Pinecone: Managed, scalable, production-ready
  • Weaviate: Open-source, hybrid search capabilities
  • Milvus: High performance, on-premise deployment
  • Chroma: Lightweight, easy local development
  • Qdrant: Fast, advanced filtering
  • FAISS: Meta's library, full control

Embedding Models

Convert text to numerical vectors for similarity search.

Popular Models:

  • text-embedding-ada-002 (OpenAI): General purpose, 1536 dimensions
  • all-MiniLM-L6-v2: Fast, lightweight, 384 dimensions
  • e5-large-v2: High quality, multilingual
  • bge-large-en-v1.5: State-of-the-art performance

Retrieval Strategies

Find relevant content based on user queries.

Approaches:

  • Dense Retrieval: Semantic similarity via embeddings
  • Sparse Retrieval: Keyword matching (BM25, TF-IDF)
  • Hybrid Search: Combine dense + sparse for best results
  • Multi-Query: Generate multiple query variations
  • Contextual Compression: Extract only relevant parts

Quick Implementation

Basic RAG Setup

java
// Load documents from file system
List<Document> documents = FileSystemDocumentLoader.loadDocuments("/path/to/docs");

// Create embedding store
InMemoryEmbeddingStore<TextSegment> embeddingStore = new InMemoryEmbeddingStore<>();

// Ingest documents into the store
EmbeddingStoreIngestor.ingest(documents, embeddingStore);

// Create AI service with RAG capability
Assistant assistant = AiServices.builder(Assistant.class)
    .chatModel(chatModel)
    .chatMemory(MessageWindowChatMemory.withMaxMessages(10))
    .contentRetriever(EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.from(embeddingStore))
    .build();

Document Processing Pipeline

java
// Split documents into chunks
DocumentSplitter splitter = new RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(
    500,  // chunk size
    100   // overlap
);

// Create embedding model
EmbeddingModel embeddingModel = OpenAiEmbeddingModel.builder()
    .apiKey(System.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY"))
    .build();

// Create embedding store
EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> embeddingStore = PgVectorEmbeddingStore.builder()
    .host("localhost")
    .database("postgres")
    .user("postgres")
    .password(System.getenv("DB_PASSWORD"))
    .table("embeddings")
    .dimension(1536)
    .build();

// Process and store documents
for (Document document : documents) {
    List<TextSegment> segments = splitter.split(document);
    for (TextSegment segment : segments) {
        Embedding embedding = embeddingModel.embed(segment).content();
        embeddingStore.add(embedding, segment);
    }
}

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Simple Document Q&A

Create a basic Q&A system over your documents.

java
public interface DocumentAssistant {
    String answer(String question);
}

DocumentAssistant assistant = AiServices.builder(DocumentAssistant.class)
    .chatModel(chatModel)
    .contentRetriever(retriever)
    .build();

Pattern 2: Metadata-Filtered Retrieval

Filter results based on document metadata.

java
// Add metadata during document loading
Document document = Document.builder()
    .text("Content here")
    .metadata("source", "technical-manual.pdf")
    .metadata("category", "technical")
    .metadata("date", "2024-01-15")
    .build();

// Filter during retrieval
EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever retriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.builder()
    .embeddingStore(embeddingStore)
    .embeddingModel(embeddingModel)
    .maxResults(5)
    .minScore(0.7)
    .filter(metadataKey("category").isEqualTo("technical"))
    .build();

Pattern 3: Multi-Source Retrieval

Combine results from multiple knowledge sources.

java
ContentRetriever webRetriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.from(webStore);
ContentRetriever documentRetriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.from(documentStore);
ContentRetriever databaseRetriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.from(databaseStore);

// Combine results
List<Content> allResults = new ArrayList<>();
allResults.addAll(webRetriever.retrieve(query));
allResults.addAll(documentRetriever.retrieve(query));
allResults.addAll(databaseRetriever.retrieve(query));

// Rerank combined results
List<Content> rerankedResults = reranker.reorder(query, allResults);

Best Practices

Document Preparation

  • Clean and preprocess documents before ingestion
  • Remove irrelevant content and formatting artifacts
  • Standardize document structure for consistent processing
  • Add relevant metadata for filtering and context

Chunking Strategy

  • Use 500-1000 tokens per chunk for optimal balance
  • Include 10-20% overlap to preserve context at boundaries
  • Consider document structure when determining chunk boundaries
  • Test different chunk sizes for your specific use case

Retrieval Optimization

  • Start with high k values (10-20) then filter/rerank
  • Use metadata filtering to improve relevance
  • Combine multiple retrieval strategies for better coverage
  • Monitor retrieval quality and user feedback

Performance Considerations

  • Cache embeddings for frequently accessed content
  • Use batch processing for document ingestion
  • Optimize vector store configuration for your scale
  • Monitor query performance and system resources

Common Issues and Solutions

Poor Retrieval Quality

Problem: Retrieved documents don't match user queries Solutions:

  • Improve document preprocessing and cleaning
  • Adjust chunk size and overlap parameters
  • Try different embedding models
  • Use hybrid search combining semantic and keyword matching

Irrelevant Results

Problem: Retrieved documents contain relevant information but are not specific enough Solutions:

  • Add metadata filtering for domain-specific constraints
  • Implement reranking with cross-encoder models
  • Use contextual compression to extract relevant parts
  • Fine-tune retrieval parameters (k values, similarity thresholds)

Performance Issues

Problem: Slow response times during retrieval Solutions:

  • Optimize vector store configuration and indexing
  • Implement caching for frequently retrieved content
  • Use smaller embedding models for faster inference
  • Consider approximate nearest neighbor algorithms

Hallucination Prevention

Problem: AI generates information not present in retrieved documents Solutions:

  • Improve prompt engineering to emphasize grounding
  • Add verification steps to check answer alignment
  • Include confidence scoring for responses
  • Implement fact-checking mechanisms

Evaluation Framework

Retrieval Metrics

  • Precision@k: Percentage of relevant documents in top-k results
  • Recall@k: Percentage of all relevant documents found in top-k results
  • Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR): Average rank of first relevant result
  • Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG): Ranking quality metric

Answer Quality Metrics

  • Faithfulness: Degree to which answers are grounded in retrieved documents
  • Answer Relevance: How well answers address user questions
  • Context Recall: Percentage of relevant context used in answers
  • Context Precision: Percentage of retrieved context that is relevant

User Experience Metrics

  • Response Time: Time from query to answer
  • User Satisfaction: Feedback ratings on answer quality
  • Task Completion: Rate of successful task completion
  • Engagement: User interaction patterns with the system

Resources

Reference Documentation

Assets

  • assets/vector-store-config.yaml - Configuration templates for different vector stores
  • assets/retriever-pipeline.java - Complete RAG pipeline implementation
  • assets/evaluation-metrics.java - Evaluation framework code

Constraints and Limitations

  1. Token Limits: Respect model context window limitations
  2. API Rate Limits: Manage external API rate limits and costs
  3. Data Privacy: Ensure compliance with data protection regulations
  4. Resource Requirements: Consider memory and computational requirements
  5. Maintenance: Plan for regular updates and system monitoring

Constraints and Warnings

System Constraints

  • Embedding models have maximum token limits per document
  • Vector databases require proper indexing for performance
  • Chunk boundaries may lose context for complex documents
  • Hybrid search requires additional infrastructure components

Quality Considerations

  • Retrieval quality depends heavily on chunking strategy
  • Embedding models may not capture domain-specific semantics
  • Metadata filtering requires proper document annotation
  • Reranking adds latency to query responses

Operational Warnings

  • Monitor vector database storage and query performance
  • Implement proper data backup and recovery procedures
  • Regular embedding model updates may affect retrieval quality
  • Document processing pipelines require ongoing maintenance

Security Considerations

  • Never hardcode credentials: Always use environment variables or secrets managers for API keys, database passwords, and other sensitive values
  • Secure access to vector databases and embedding services
  • Implement proper authentication and authorization
  • Validate and sanitize all external content before ingestion: documents loaded from file systems, databases, APIs, or web sources may contain malicious content that could influence model behavior through indirect prompt injection
  • Apply content filtering on retrieved documents before passing them to the LLM to mitigate prompt injection risks
  • Restrict allowed data source URLs and file paths using allowlists
  • Monitor for abuse and unusual usage patterns
  • Regular security audits and penetration testing

相关 Skills

Claude接口

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向接入 Claude API、Anthropic SDK 或 Agent SDK 的开发场景,自动识别项目语言并给出对应示例与默认配置,快速搭建 LLM 应用。

想把Claude能力接进应用或智能体,用claude-api上手快、兼容Anthropic与Agent SDK,集成路径清晰又省心

AI 与智能体
未扫描147.7k

RAG架构师

by alirezarezvani

Universal
热门

聚焦生产级RAG系统设计与优化,覆盖文档切块、检索链路、索引构建、召回评估等关键环节,适合搭建可扩展、高准确率的知识库问答与检索增强应用。

面向RAG落地,把知识库、向量检索和生成链路系统串联起来,做架构设计时更清晰,也更少踩坑。

AI 与智能体
未扫描17.5k

多智能体架构

by alirezarezvani

Universal
热门

聚焦多智能体系统架构设计,梳理 Supervisor、Swarm、分层和 Pipeline 等模式,覆盖角色定义、通信协作与性能评估,适合规划稳健可扩展的 AI agent 编排方案。

帮你系统解决多智能体应用的架构设计与协同编排难题,适合构建复杂 AI 工作流,成熟度高、社区认可也很亮眼。

AI 与智能体
未扫描17.5k

相关 MCP 服务

知识图谱记忆

编辑精选

by Anthropic

热门

Memory 是一个基于本地知识图谱的持久化记忆系统,让 AI 记住长期上下文。

帮 AI 和智能体补上“记不住”的短板,用本地知识图谱沉淀长期上下文,连续对话更聪明,数据也更可控。

AI 与智能体
86.9k

顺序思维

编辑精选

by Anthropic

热门

Sequential Thinking 是让 AI 通过动态思维链解决复杂问题的参考服务器。

这个服务器展示了如何让 Claude 像人类一样逐步推理,适合开发者学习 MCP 的思维链实现。但注意它只是个参考示例,别指望直接用在生产环境里。

AI 与智能体
86.9k

PraisonAI

编辑精选

by mervinpraison

热门

PraisonAI 是一个支持自反思和多 LLM 的低代码 AI 智能体框架。

如果你需要快速搭建一个能 24/7 运行的 AI 智能体团队来处理复杂任务(比如自动研究或代码生成),PraisonAI 的低代码设计和多平台集成(如 Telegram)让它上手极快。但作为非官方项目,它的生态成熟度可能不如 LangChain 等主流框架,适合愿意尝鲜的开发者。

AI 与智能体
8.1k

相关资讯

本文提出OCC-RAG,一个通过大规模合成多上下文、多跳问答数据训练的小语言模型系列。实验表明,该模型在多跳推理、忠实性和拒答基准上可匹敌或超越2-6倍大小的通用模型,证明了任务专用小模型的潜力。

深度·6月4日·23 分钟

本文提出TASTE方法,通过反向任务构建流程自动生成具有更广工具覆盖和更高难度的智能体基准任务。使用TASTE构建的τ^c-Bench在三个领域扩展了τ^2-Bench,实验表明原本接近饱和的模型性能大幅下降,且工具组合数量翻倍。该方法为未来智能体提供了可扩展的持续评估途径。

深度·6月4日·20 分钟

本文揭示了水印技术的一个根本漏洞:当用户使用多个大语言模型时(如市场中的多个提供商),整合它们的输出分布可以消除水印痕迹。实验表明,仅需集成3-5个模型即可将检测z分数降至阈值以下,并将假阳性率控制在5%以内,同时提升文本质量27.5%、速度提高6倍。该发现对AI文本检测的鲁棒性提出了严峻挑战,需提供商间前所未有的协调。

深度·6月4日·34 分钟

评论