合同审阅
redline
by chipmunkrpa
Review and redline DOCX contracts paragraph by paragraph with tracked changes, clause-level risk analysis, and draft comment responses. Use when a user wants contract revisions that are specific to each paragraph or bullet, especially for privacy, security, data-processing, liability, AI, or other negotiated legal terms.
安装
claude skill add --url github.com/openclaw/skills/tree/main/skills/chipmunkrpa/redline-contract文档
Redline
Overview
Use this skill to review contract .docx files at paragraph level and generate:
- a tracked-changes amended
.docx - a risk-report
.docx - a
.review.jsonreview dataset
Do not collapse multiple operative paragraphs into one generic comment. Each non-empty paragraph or bullet must be reviewed on its own merits, with distinct risk analysis and replacement language where needed.
Workflow
- Confirm the supported party and the priority risk areas.
- Run
scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py init-reviewfor each source.docx. - Review the generated
.review.jsonparagraph by paragraph. - For each
clauses[]entry, write a specific assessment tied to that paragraph only:favorabilityrisk_levelrisk_summarywhy_it_mattersproposed_replacement
- Draft specific responses for any opponent comments in
opponent_comments[]. - Run
materializeto create the amended.docxand risk report.docx. - Verify the outputs exist and the tracked changes are readable.
Required Review Standard
- Treat each review unit as one paragraph-level issue, not a whole section summary.
- Do not reuse the same replacement text across unrelated paragraphs.
- If several bullets in the same section have different obligations, analyze and redraft them separately.
- Keep replacement language narrow and operational. Match the exact risk in the source paragraph.
- When reviewing privacy and security language, check for:
- uncapped or super-capped liability exposure
- audit overreach
- subprocessor approval friction
- cross-border transfer restrictions
- incident notification deadlines
- certifications, penetration testing, and customer testing rights
- unilateral policy updates
- AI/security terms that exceed the actual service model
Commands
Initialize a review file:
python scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py init-review \
--input <contract.docx> \
--output <contract.review.json> \
--supported-party "<party>" \
--focus-area "<area-1>" \
--focus-area "<area-2>" \
--opponent-comment-author "<author-1>"
Materialize the outputs:
python scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py materialize \
--input <contract.docx> \
--review-json <contract.review.json> \
--amended-output <contract.amended.docx> \
--report-output <contract.risk-report.docx> \
--author "Codex Redline Reviewer"
Resources
- JSON field details:
references/review-json-schema.md - Main tool:
scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py
相关 Skills
资深架构师
by alirezarezvani
适合系统设计评审、ADR记录和扩展性规划,分析依赖与耦合,权衡单体或微服务、数据库与技术栈选型,并输出Mermaid、PlantUML、ASCII架构图。
✎ 搞系统设计、技术选型和扩展规划时,用它能更快理清架构决策与依赖关系,还能直接产出 Mermaid/PlantUML 图,方案讨论效率很高。
技术栈评估
by alirezarezvani
对比框架、数据库和云服务,结合 5 年 TCO、安全风险、生态活力与迁移复杂度做量化评估,适合技术选型、栈升级和替换路线决策。
✎ 帮你系统比较技术栈优劣,不只看功能,还把TCO、安全性和生态健康度一起量化,选型和迁移决策更稳。
资深数据科学家
by alirezarezvani
覆盖实验设计、特征工程、预测建模、因果推断与模型评估,适合用 Python/R/SQL 做 A/B 测试、时序分析和生产级 ML 落地,支撑数据驱动决策。
✎ 从 A/B 测试、因果分析到预测建模一条龙搞定,既有硬核统计方法也懂业务沟通,特别适合把数据结论真正落地。
相关 MCP 服务
PostgreSQL 数据库
编辑精选by Anthropic
PostgreSQL 是让 Claude 直接查询和管理你的数据库的 MCP 服务器。
✎ 这个服务器解决了开发者需要手动编写 SQL 查询的痛点,特别适合数据分析师或后端开发者快速探索数据库结构。不过,由于是参考实现,生产环境使用前务必评估安全风险,别指望它能处理复杂事务。
SQLite 数据库
编辑精选by Anthropic
SQLite 是让 AI 直接查询本地数据库进行数据分析的 MCP 服务器。
✎ 这个服务器解决了 AI 无法直接访问 SQLite 数据库的问题,适合需要快速分析本地数据集的开发者。不过,作为参考实现,它可能缺乏生产级的安全特性,建议在受控环境中使用。
Firecrawl 智能爬虫
编辑精选by Firecrawl
Firecrawl 是让 AI 直接抓取网页并提取结构化数据的 MCP 服务器。
✎ 它解决了手动写爬虫的麻烦,让 Claude 能直接访问动态网页内容。最适合需要实时数据的研究者或开发者,比如监控竞品价格或抓取新闻。但要注意,它依赖第三方 API,可能涉及隐私和成本问题。