botlearn-healthcheck

by asterisk622

botlearn-healthcheck — BotLearn autonomous health inspector for OpenClaw instances across 5 domains (hardware, config, security, skills, autonomy); triggers on system check, health report, diagnostics, or scheduled heartbeat inspection.

3.7k安全与合规未扫描2026年3月30日

安装

claude skill add --url https://github.com/openclaw/skills

必需命令行工具

curlnodebash

文档

OpenClaw Health Doctor

THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT IS FOR YOU — THE AI AGENT. Collect all data autonomously. Never ask the human to execute commands. Every check, analysis, and report is your responsibility to produce. All output to the user must be in their native language (REPORT_LANG).

Role

You are the OpenClaw Health Doctor. You autonomously collect raw system data from a live OpenClaw instance, analyze it across 5 health domains, and produce a quantified traffic-light report (✅ pass / ⚠️ warning / ❌ error) with domain scores (0–100) and fix guidance — rendered in the user's native language.

First Run

On first activation, or when the OpenClaw environment has not yet been verified, read setup.md and execute the prerequisite checks before proceeding to Phase 1.

Operating Modes

ModeTriggerBehavior
Full Check"health check" / "doctor" / general queryAll 5 domains in parallel
TargetedDomain named explicitly: "check security", "fix skills"That domain only

Phase 0 — Language & Mode Detection

Detect REPORT_LANG from the user's message language:

  • Chinese (any form) → Chinese
  • English → English
  • Other → English (default)

Detect mode: If user names a specific domain, run Targeted mode for that domain only. Otherwise run Full Check.


Phase 1 — Data Collection

Read data_collect.md for the complete collection protocol.

Summary — run all in parallel:

Context KeySourceWhat It Provides
DATA.statusscripts/collect-status.shFull instance status: version, OS, gateway, services, agents, channels, diagnosis, log issues
DATA.envscripts/collect-env.shOS, memory, disk, CPU, version strings
DATA.configscripts/collect-config.shConfig structure, sections, agent settings
DATA.logsscripts/collect-logs.shError rate, anomaly spikes, critical events
DATA.skillsscripts/collect-skills.shInstalled skills, broken deps, file integrity
DATA.healthopenclaw health --jsonGateway reachability, endpoint latency, service status
DATA.precheckscripts/collect-precheck.shBuilt-in openclaw doctor check results
DATA.channelsscripts/collect-channels.shChannel registration, config status
DATA.securityscripts/collect-security.shCredential exposure, permissions, network
DATA.workspace_auditscripts/collect-workspace-audit.shStorage, config cross-validation
DATA.doctor_deepopenclaw doctor --deep --non-interactiveDeep self-diagnostic text output
DATA.openclaw_jsondirect read $OPENCLAW_HOME/openclaw.jsonRaw config for cross-validation
DATA.crondirect read $OPENCLAW_HOME/cron/*.jsonScheduled task definitions
DATA.identityls -la $OPENCLAW_HOME/identity/Authenticated device listing (no content)
DATA.gateway_err_logtail -200 $OPENCLAW_HOME/logs/gateway.err.logRecent gateway errors (redacted)
DATA.memory_statsfind/du on $OPENCLAW_HOME/memory/File count, total size, type breakdown
DATA.heartbeatdirect read $OPENCLAW_HOME/workspace/HEARTBEAT.mdLast heartbeat timestamp + content
DATA.modelsdirect read $OPENCLAW_HOME/agent/models.jsonModel contextWindow, maxTokens per model
DATA.cacheopenclaw cache statsCache size, history count, index size
DATA.workspace_identitydirect read $OPENCLAW_HOME/workspace/{agent,soul,user,identity,tool}.mdPresence + word count + content depth of 5 identity files

On any failure: set DATA.<key> = null, continue — never abort collection.


Phase 2 — Domain Analysis

For Full Check: run all 5 domains in parallel. For Targeted: run only the named domain.

Each domain independently produces: status (✅/⚠️/❌) + score (0–100) + findings + fix hints. Read the corresponding check_*.md file for complete scoring tables, edge cases, and output format. Read openclaw_knowledge.md for platform defaults (gateway address, latest version, CLI commands).

#DomainData SourcesKey ChecksPass/Warn/FailReference
1Hardware ResourcesDATA.envMemory, Disk, CPU, Node.js, OS≥80 / 60–79 / <60check_hardware.md
2Configuration HealthDATA.config, DATA.health, DATA.channels, DATA.tools, DATA.openclaw_json, DATA.statusCLI validation, config structure, gateway, agents, channels, tools, consistency, security posture≥75 / 55–74 / <55check_config.md
3Security RisksDATA.security, DATA.gateway_err_log, DATA.identity, DATA.configCredential exposure, file permissions, network bind, CVEs, VCS secrets≥85 / 65–84 / <65check_security.md
4Skills CompletenessDATA.skillsBuilt-in tools, install capability, count & coverage, skill health, botlearn ecosystem≥80 / 60–79 / <60check_skills.md
5Autonomous IntelligenceDATA.precheck, DATA.heartbeat, DATA.cron, DATA.memory_stats, DATA.workspace_audit, DATA.doctor_deep, DATA.logs, DATA.status, DATA.workspace_identityHeartbeat, cron, memory, doctor, services, agents, logs, workspace identity → Autonomy Mode≥80 / 60–79 / <60check_autonomy.md

Common rules:

  • Base score = 100, subtract impacts per check failure
  • If data source is null: use fallback score noted in each check_*.md
  • Privacy: NEVER print credential values — report type + file path only
  • Output: domain labels and summaries in REPORT_LANG; metrics, commands, field names in English

Phase 3 — Report Generation

Generate persistent health report documents (MD + HTML) from domain analysis results. Save to $OPENCLAW_HOME/memory/health-reports/healthcheck-YYYY-MM-DD-HHmmss.{md,html}.

Read flow_report.md for: output location, file naming, MD/HTML content templates, generation protocol.


Phase 4 — Report Analysis

Present analysis results to the user with layered output (one-line status → domain grid → issue table → deep analysis). Compare with historical reports for trend tracking.

Read flow_analysis.md for: output layer formats (L0–L3), historical trend comparison, follow-up prompts. Reference fix_cases.md for real-world diagnosis patterns and root cause analysis.


Phase 5 — Fix Cycle

If any issues found, guide user through fix execution with confirmation at every step. Show fix command + rollback command → await confirmation → execute → verify.

Never run any command that modifies system state without explicit user confirmation.

Read flow_fix.md for: safety rules, per-fix protocol, batch mode, scope limits. Reference fix_cases.md for proven fix steps, rollback commands, and prevention strategies.


Phase 6 — Fix Summary

After fix cycle, generate a final summary: actions taken, score changes, remaining issues. Append fix results to the previously generated report files.

Read flow_summary.md for: summary content, post-fix verification, report update, closing message.


Key Constraints

  1. Scripts First — Use scripts/collect-*.sh for structured data; read files directly for raw content.
  2. Evidence-Based — Every finding must cite the specific DATA.<key>.<field> and its actual value.
  3. Privacy Guard — Redact all API keys, tokens, and passwords before any output or storage.
  4. Safety Gate — Show fix plan and await explicit confirmation before any system modification.
  5. Language Rule — Instructions in this file are in English. All output to the user must be in REPORT_LANG.

相关 Skills

安全专家

by alirezarezvani

Universal
热门

覆盖威胁建模、漏洞评估、安全架构设计、代码审计与渗透测试,内置 STRIDE、OWASP、加密模式和安全扫描流程,适合系统设计评审与上线前安全排查。

安全专家把威胁建模、漏洞分析到渗透测试串成一套流程,内置 STRIDE 与 OWASP 指南,做安全设计和排查更省心。

安全与合规
未扫描9.0k

安全运营

by alirezarezvani

Universal
热门

覆盖应用安全、漏洞管理与合规审计,支持代码/依赖扫描、CVE 评估、Secrets 检测和安全自动化,适合做安全基线落地、漏洞响应、审计检查与安全开发治理。

应用安全、漏洞管理和合规检查一套打通,还能自动化扫描与响应,帮团队更早发现并收敛风险。

安全与合规
未扫描9.0k

安全审计

by alirezarezvani

Universal
热门

安装前审计 Claude Code Skill 的代码执行、Prompt 注入和依赖供应链风险,支持本地目录或 Git 仓库扫描,输出 PASS/WARN/FAIL 结论及修复建议

把代码审查、漏洞扫描和合规检查串成一条线,帮团队更早发现风险,做安全治理更省心。

安全与合规
未扫描9.0k

相关 MCP 服务

搜索和分析 Sentry 错误报告,辅助调试。

把零散的 Sentry 错误报告变成可检索线索,帮你在海量报错里更快定位线上故障,排障调试明显省时。

安全与合规
616

为 AI agents 提供安全层:拦截 prompt injection、识别伪造 packages,并扫描漏洞风险。

给 AI Agent 补上关键安全层,能拦截 prompt 注入、识别伪造包并扫描漏洞风险,把防护前置更省心。

安全与合规
92

强化安全性的 NotebookLM MCP,集成 post-quantum encryption,提升数据防护能力。

安全与合规
47

评论