技能评估器
skill-reviewer
by ann0501
Score and grade AgentSkills across four dimensions: design quality, content quality, security, and usability. Use when asked to score, grade, evaluate, or rate a skill's quality — producing a numeric scorecard with dimension-by-dimension ratings. Triggers on "score this skill", "grade skill", "rate skill quality", "evaluate skill", "skill scorecard", "给技能打分", "技能评分".
安装
claude skill add --url https://github.com/openclaw/skills文档
Skill Reviewer
Four-dimension quality auditor for AgentSkills.
Review Process
Step 1: Inventory & Classify
find /path/to/skill -type f— list all files. If path doesn't exist or is empty, abort with error.- Read
_meta.jsonor.clawhub/origin.jsonif present (source, version, author info). - Read SKILL.md in full.
- Classify skill type per
references/weight-adjustment.md→ determine weights.
Step 2: Scan
- SKILL.md (full read)
- scripts/ (full read, do NOT execute)
- references/ (full read if ≤10 files or ≤50KB total; spot-check otherwise)
- assets/ (list filenames, flag non-asset file types: .sh/.py/.exe/.bat/.ps1 in assets/ = suspicious)
- Other files (.json, dotfiles, symlinks) — inspect each
Step 3: Score Each Dimension
Load reference files: references/design-quality.md, references/content-quality.md, references/security.md, references/usability.md.
For each dimension, walk the checklist and score per the rubric. Cite [file:line] for each finding.
Security shortcut: Run grep sweeps for CRITICAL patterns first (see security.md C1-C11). If any CRITICAL found → D3=1, note it, but still score remaining dimensions — don't skip them.
Orphan file check (security.md): After reading SKILL.md, cross-reference all mentioned files against the actual file list. Flag orphans.
Step 4: Calculate & Verdict
Weighted total = Σ(dim_score × adjusted_weight)
| Verdict | Condition |
|---|---|
| ✅ PASS | Total ≥ 8 AND every dimension ≥ 6 AND no CRITICAL findings |
| 🔧 REVISE | Total < 8 OR any dimension < 6 OR any CRITICAL finding |
CRITICAL auto-revise: Even if total ≥ 8, any security CRITICAL finding forces REVISE.
Report Format
Use list format (not tables — compatible with all platforms):
PASS:
【技能审校通过】
技能:{name}
路径:{path}
类型:{type}
综合得分:{score}/10
审校日期:{date}
• 设计质量({w1}%):{d1}/10 — {简要说明}
• 内容质量({w2}%):{d2}/10 — {简要说明}
• 安全性({w3}%):{d3}/10 — {简要说明}
• 实用性({w4}%):{d4}/10 — {简要说明}
亮点:
- {亮点1}
- {亮点2}
REVISE:
【技能审校打回】
技能:{name}
路径:{path}
类型:{type}
综合得分:{score}/10
审校日期:{date}
⚠️ 判定维度:
• 设计质量({w1}%):{d1}/10
• 内容质量({w2}%):{d2}/10
• 安全性({w3}%):{d3}/10
• 实用性({w4}%):{d4}/10
具体问题:
- [D1] {issue} — {file}:{line}
- [D3] 🔴 CRITICAL: {issue} — {file}:{line}
改进方向:
- {方向1}
- {方向2}
达标标准:
- {标准1}
- {标准2}
References
references/weight-adjustment.md— type classification + weight matrixreferences/design-quality.md— D1 checklist + rubric + scoring rulesreferences/content-quality.md— D2 checklist + rubric + scoring rulesreferences/security.md— D3 pattern table + detection commandsreferences/usability.md— D4 checklist + rubric + scoring rules
相关 Skills
文档共著
by anthropics
围绕文档、提案、技术规格、决策记录等写作任务,按上下文收集、结构迭代、读者测试三步协作共创,减少信息遗漏,写出更清晰、经得起他人阅读的内容。
✎ 写文档、方案或技术规格时容易思路散、信息漏,它用结构化共著流程帮你高效传递上下文、反复打磨内容,还能从读者视角做验证。
内部沟通
by anthropics
按公司常用模板和语气快速起草内部沟通内容,覆盖 3P 更新、状态报告、领导汇报、项目进展、事故复盘、FAQ 与 newsletter,适合需要统一格式的团队沟通场景。
✎ 按公司偏好的模板快速产出状态汇报、领导更新和 FAQ,既省去反复改稿,也让内部沟通更统一、更专业。
平面设计
by anthropics
先生成视觉哲学,再落地成原创海报、艺术画面或其他静态设计,输出 .png/.pdf,强调构图、色彩与空间表达,适合需要高完成度视觉成品的场景。
✎ 做海报、插画或静态视觉稿时,用它能快速产出兼顾美感与版式的PNG/PDF成品,原创设计更省心,也更适合规避版权风险。
相关 MCP 服务
by nirholas
免费的加密新闻聚合 MCP,汇集 Bitcoin、Ethereum、DeFi、Solana 与 altcoins 资讯源。
by ProfessionalWiki
让 Large Language Model 客户端无缝连接任意 MediaWiki 站点,可创建、更新、搜索页面,并通过 OAuth 2.0 安全管理内容。
by roomi-fields
Automate Google NotebookLM — Q&A with citations, audio, video, content generation