Rust代码审查

rust-code-review

by anderskev

Reviews Rust code for ownership, borrowing, lifetime, error handling, trait design, unsafe usage, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .rs files, checking borrow checker issues, error handling patterns, or trait implementations. Covers Rust 2021 edition patterns and modern idioms.

3.9k编码与调试未扫描2026年4月6日

安装

claude skill add --url https://github.com/openclaw/skills

文档

Rust Code Review

Review Workflow

Follow this sequence to avoid false positives and catch edition-specific issues:

  1. Check Cargo.toml — Note the Rust edition (2018, 2021, 2024) and MSRV if set. This determines which patterns apply. Check workspace structure if present.
  2. Check dependencies — Note key crates (thiserror vs anyhow, tokio features, serde features). These inform which patterns are expected.
  3. Scan changed files — Read full functions, not just diffs. Many Rust bugs hide in ownership flow across a function.
  4. Check each category — Work through the checklist below, loading references as needed.
  5. Verify before reporting — Load beagle-rust:review-verification-protocol before submitting findings.

Output Format

Report findings as:

text
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Ownership transfers, borrowing conflicts, lifetime issuesreferences/ownership-borrowing.md
Result/Option handling, thiserror, anyhow, error contextreferences/error-handling.md
Async pitfalls, Send/Sync bounds, runtime blockingreferences/async-concurrency.md
Unsafe usage, clippy patterns, API design, performancereferences/common-mistakes.md

Review Checklist

Ownership and Borrowing

  • No unnecessary .clone() to silence the borrow checker (hiding design issues)
  • References have appropriate lifetimes (not overly broad 'static when shorter lifetime works)
  • &str preferred over String in function parameters when ownership isn't needed
  • impl AsRef<T> or Into<T> used for flexible API parameters
  • No dangling references or use-after-move
  • Interior mutability (Cell, RefCell, Mutex) used only when shared mutation is genuinely needed
  • Small types (≤24 bytes) derive Copy and are passed by value
  • Cow<'_, T> used when ownership is ambiguous

Error Handling

  • Result<T, E> used for recoverable errors, not panic!/unwrap/expect
  • Error types provide context (thiserror with #[error("...")] or manual Display)
  • ? operator used with proper From implementations or .map_err()
  • unwrap() / expect() only in tests, examples, or provably-safe contexts
  • Error variants are specific enough to be actionable by callers
  • anyhow used in applications, thiserror in libraries (or clear rationale for alternatives)
  • _or_else variants used when fallbacks involve allocation (ok_or_else, unwrap_or_else)
  • let-else used for early returns on failure (let Ok(x) = expr else { return ... })
  • inspect_err used for error logging, map_err for error transformation

Traits and Types

  • Traits are minimal and cohesive (single responsibility)
  • derive macros appropriate for the type (Clone, Debug, PartialEq used correctly)
  • Newtypes used to prevent primitive obsession (e.g., struct UserId(Uuid) not bare Uuid)
  • From/Into implementations are lossless and infallible; TryFrom for fallible conversions
  • Sealed traits used when external implementations shouldn't be allowed
  • Default implementations provided where they make sense
  • Send + Sync bounds verified for types shared across threads

Unsafe Code

  • unsafe blocks have safety comments explaining invariants
  • unsafe is minimal — only the truly unsafe operation is inside the block
  • Safety invariants are documented and upheld by surrounding safe code
  • No undefined behavior (null pointer deref, data races, invalid memory access)
  • unsafe trait implementations justify why the contract is upheld

Naming and Style

  • Types are PascalCase, functions/methods snake_case, constants SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE
  • Modules use snake_case
  • is_, has_, can_ prefixes for boolean-returning methods
  • Builder pattern methods take and return self (not &mut self) for chaining
  • Public items have doc comments (///)
  • #[must_use] on functions where ignoring the return value is likely a bug
  • Imports ordered: std → external crates → workspace → crate/super
  • #[expect(clippy::...)] preferred over #[allow(...)] for lint suppression

Performance

  • No unnecessary allocations in hot paths (prefer &str over String, &[T] over Vec<T>)
  • collect() type is specified or inferable
  • Iterators preferred over indexed loops for collection transforms
  • Vec::with_capacity() used when size is known
  • No redundant .to_string() / .to_owned() chains
  • No intermediate .collect() when passing iterators directly works
  • .sum() preferred over .fold() for summation
  • Static dispatch (impl Trait) used over dynamic (dyn Trait) unless flexibility required

Linting

  • cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings passes
  • Key lints respected: redundant_clone, large_enum_variant, needless_collect
  • Workspace lint configuration in Cargo.toml for consistent enforcement
  • Doc lints enabled for library crates (missing_docs, broken_intra_doc_links)

Severity Calibration

Critical (Block Merge)

  • unsafe code with unsound invariants or undefined behavior
  • Use-after-free or dangling reference patterns
  • unwrap() on user input or external data in production code
  • Data races (concurrent mutation without synchronization)
  • Memory leaks via circular Arc<Mutex<...>> without weak references

Major (Should Fix)

  • Errors returned without context (bare return err equivalent)
  • .clone() masking ownership design issues in hot paths
  • Missing Send/Sync bounds on types used across threads
  • panic! for recoverable errors in library code
  • Overly broad 'static lifetimes hiding API design issues

Minor (Consider Fixing)

  • Missing doc comments on public items
  • String parameter where &str or impl AsRef<str> would work
  • Derive macros missing for types that should have them
  • Unused feature flags in Cargo.toml
  • Suboptimal iterator chains (multiple allocations where one suffices)

Informational (Note Only)

  • Suggestions to introduce newtypes for domain modeling
  • Refactoring ideas for trait design
  • Performance optimizations without measured impact
  • Suggestions to add #[must_use] or #[non_exhaustive]

When to Load References

  • Reviewing ownership transfers, borrows, or lifetimes → ownership-borrowing.md
  • Reviewing Result/Option handling or error types → error-handling.md
  • Reviewing async code, tokio usage, or Send/Sync bounds → async-concurrency.md
  • General review (unsafe, performance, API design, clippy) → common-mistakes.md

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are acceptable Rust patterns — reporting them wastes developer time:

  • .clone() in tests — Clarity over performance in test code
  • unwrap() in tests and examples — Acceptable where panicking on failure is intentional
  • Box<dyn Error> in simple binaries — Not every application needs custom error types
  • String fields in structs — Owned data in structs is correct; &str fields require lifetime parameters
  • #[allow(dead_code)] during development — Common during iteration
  • todo!() / unimplemented!() in new code — Valid placeholder during active development
  • .expect("reason") with clear message — Self-documenting and acceptable for invariants
  • use super::* in test modules — Standard pattern for #[cfg(test)] modules
  • Type aliases for complex typestype Result<T> = std::result::Result<T, MyError> is idiomatic
  • impl Trait in return position — Zero-cost abstraction, standard pattern
  • Turbofish syntaxcollect::<Vec<_>>() is idiomatic when type inference needs help
  • _ prefix for intentionally unused variables — Compiler convention
  • #[expect(clippy::...)] with justification — Self-cleaning lint suppression
  • Arc::clone(&arc) — Explicit Arc cloning is idiomatic and recommended
  • std::sync::Mutex for short critical sections in async — Tokio docs recommend this
  • for loops over iterators — When early exit or side effects are needed

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag these issues when the specific conditions apply:

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Missing error contextError crosses module boundary without context
Unnecessary .clone()In hot path or repeated call, not test/setup code
Missing doc commentsItem is pub and not in a #[cfg(test)] module
unwrap() usageIn production code path, not test/example/provably-safe
Missing Send + SyncType is actually shared across thread/task boundaries
Overly broad lifetimeA shorter lifetime would work AND the API is public
Missing #[must_use]Function returns a value that callers commonly ignore
Stale #[allow] suppressionShould be #[expect] for self-cleaning lint management
Missing Copy deriveType is ≤24 bytes with all-Copy fields and used frequently

Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow beagle-rust:review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.

相关 Skills

前端设计

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向组件、页面、海报和 Web 应用开发,按鲜明视觉方向生成可直接落地的前端代码与高质感 UI,适合做 landing page、Dashboard 或美化现有界面,避开千篇一律的 AI 审美。

想把页面做得既能上线又有设计感,就用前端设计:组件到整站都能产出,难得的是能避开千篇一律的 AI 味。

编码与调试
未扫描111.8k

网页构建器

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向复杂 claude.ai HTML artifact 开发,快速初始化 React + Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui 项目并打包为单文件 HTML,适合需要状态管理、路由或多组件交互的页面。

在 claude.ai 里做复杂网页 Artifact 很省心,多组件、状态和路由都能顺手搭起来,React、Tailwind 与 shadcn/ui 组合效率高、成品也更精致。

编码与调试
未扫描111.8k

网页应用测试

by anthropics

Universal
热门

用 Playwright 为本地 Web 应用编写自动化测试,支持启动开发服务器、校验前端交互、排查 UI 异常、抓取截图与浏览器日志,适合调试动态页面和回归验证。

借助 Playwright 一站式验证本地 Web 应用前端功能,调 UI 时还能同步查看日志和截图,定位问题更快。

编码与调试
未扫描111.8k

相关 MCP 服务

GitHub

编辑精选

by GitHub

热门

GitHub 是 MCP 官方参考服务器,让 Claude 直接读写你的代码仓库和 Issues。

这个参考服务器解决了开发者想让 AI 安全访问 GitHub 数据的问题,适合需要自动化代码审查或 Issue 管理的团队。但注意它只是参考实现,生产环境得自己加固安全。

编码与调试
83.1k

by Context7

热门

Context7 是实时拉取最新文档和代码示例的智能助手,让你告别过时资料。

它能解决开发者查找文档时信息滞后的问题,特别适合快速上手新库或跟进更新。不过,依赖外部源可能导致偶尔的数据延迟,建议结合官方文档使用。

编码与调试
51.8k

by tldraw

热门

tldraw 是让 AI 助手直接在无限画布上绘图和协作的 MCP 服务器。

这解决了 AI 只能输出文本、无法视觉化协作的痛点——想象让 Claude 帮你画流程图或白板讨论。最适合需要快速原型设计或头脑风暴的开发者。不过,目前它只是个基础连接器,你得自己搭建画布应用才能发挥全部潜力。

编码与调试
46.2k

评论