宏代码审查

macros-code-review

by anderskev

Reviews Rust macro code for hygiene issues, fragment misuse, compile-time impact, and procedural macro patterns. Use when reviewing macro_rules! definitions, procedural macros, derive macros, or attribute macros.

4.4k编码与调试未扫描2026年4月20日

安装

claude skill add --url https://github.com/openclaw/skills

文档

Macros Code Review

Review Workflow

  1. Check Cargo.toml -- Note Rust edition (2024 reserves gen keyword, affecting macro output), proc-macro crate dependencies (syn, quote, proc-macro2), and feature flags (e.g., syn with minimal features)
  2. Check macro type -- Determine if reviewing declarative (macro_rules!), function-like proc macro, attribute macro, or derive macro
  3. Check if a macro is needed -- If the transformation is type-based, generics are better. Macros are for structural/repetitive code generation that generics cannot express
  4. Scan macro definitions -- Read full macro bodies including all match arms, not just the invocation site
  5. Check each category -- Work through the checklist below, loading references as needed
  6. Verify before reporting -- Load beagle-rust:review-verification-protocol before submitting findings

Output Format

Report findings as:

text
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Fragment types, repetition, hygiene, declarative patternsreferences/declarative-macros.md
Proc macro types, syn/quote, spans, testingreferences/procedural-macros.md

Review Checklist

Declarative Macros (macro_rules!)

  • Correct fragment types used (:expr vs :tt vs :ident -- wrong choice causes unexpected parsing)
  • Repetition separators match intended syntax (, vs ; vs none, * vs +)
  • Trailing comma/semicolon handled (add $(,)? or $(;)? at end of repetition)
  • Matchers ordered from most specific to least specific (first match wins)
  • No ambiguous expansions -- each metavariable appears in the correct repetition depth in the transcriber
  • Variables defined in the macro use macro-internal names (hygiene protects variables, not types/modules/functions)
  • Exported macros (#[macro_export]) use $crate:: for crate-internal paths, never crate:: or self::
  • Standard library paths use ::core:: and ::alloc:: (not ::std::) for no_std compatibility
  • compile_error! used for meaningful error messages on invalid input patterns
  • Macro placement respects textual scoping (defined before use) unless #[macro_export]

Procedural Macros

  • syn features minimized (don't enable full when derive suffices -- reduces compile time)
  • Spans propagated from input tokens to output tokens (errors point to user code, not macro internals)
  • Span::call_site() used for identifiers that should be visible to the caller
  • Span::mixed_site() used for identifiers private to the macro (matches macro_rules! hygiene)
  • Error reporting uses syn::Error with proper spans, not panic!
  • Multiple errors collected and reported together via syn::Error::combine
  • proc-macro2 used for testing (testable outside of compiler context)
  • Generated code volume is proportionate -- proc macros that emit large amounts of code bloat compile times

Derive Macros

  • Derivation is obvious -- a developer could guess what it does from the trait name alone
  • Helper attributes (#[serde(skip)] style) are documented
  • Trait implementation is correct for all variant shapes (unit, tuple, struct variants)
  • Generated impl blocks use fully qualified paths (::core::, $crate::)

Attribute Macros

  • Input item is preserved or intentionally transformed (not accidentally dropped)
  • Attribute arguments are validated with clear error messages
  • Test generation patterns (#[test_case] style) produce unique test names
  • Framework annotations document what code they generate

Edition 2024 Awareness

  • Macro output does not use gen as an identifier (reserved keyword -- use r#gen or rename)
  • Generated unsafe fn bodies use explicit unsafe {} blocks around unsafe ops
  • Generated extern blocks use unsafe extern

Generics vs Macros

Flag a macro when the same result is achievable with generics or trait bounds. Macros are appropriate when:

  • The generated code varies structurally (not just by type)
  • Repetitive trait impls for many concrete types
  • Test batteries with configuration variants
  • Compile-time computation that const fn cannot express

Severity Calibration

Critical (Block Merge)

  • Macro generates unsound unsafe code
  • Hygiene violation in macro that outputs unsafe blocks (caller's variables leak into unsafe context)
  • Proc macro panics instead of returning compile_error! (crashes the compiler)
  • Derive macro generates incorrect trait implementation (violates trait contract)

Major (Should Fix)

  • Exported macro uses crate:: or self:: instead of $crate:: (breaks for downstream users)
  • Exported macro uses ::std:: instead of ::core::/::alloc:: (breaks no_std users)
  • Wrong fragment type causing unexpected parsing (:expr where :tt needed, or vice versa)
  • Proc macro enables syn full features unnecessarily (compile time cost)
  • Missing span propagation (errors point to macro definition, not invocation)
  • No error handling in proc macro (panics on bad input instead of compile_error!)

Minor (Consider Fixing)

  • Missing trailing comma/semicolon tolerance in repetition patterns
  • Matcher arms not ordered most-specific-first
  • Macro used where generics would be clearer and equally expressive
  • Missing compile_error! fallback arm for invalid patterns
  • Helper attributes undocumented

Informational (Note Only)

  • Suggestions to split complex macro_rules! into a proc macro
  • Suggestions to reduce generated code volume
  • TT munching or push-down accumulation patterns that could be simplified

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • macro_rules! for test batteries -- Generating repetitive test modules from a list of types/configs
  • macro_rules! for trait impls -- Implementing a trait for many concrete types with identical bodies
  • TT munching -- Valid advanced pattern for recursive token processing
  • Push-down accumulation -- Valid pattern for building output incrementally across recursive calls
  • #[macro_export] with $crate -- Correct way to make macros usable outside the defining crate
  • Span::call_site() for generated functions -- Intentionally making generated items visible to callers
  • syn::Error::to_compile_error() -- Correct error reporting pattern in proc macros
  • trybuild tests for proc macros -- Standard compile-fail testing approach
  • Attribute macros on test functions -- Common pattern for test setup/teardown
  • compile_error! in impossible match arms -- Good practice for catching invalid macro input

Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow beagle-rust:review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.

相关 Skills

网页构建器

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向复杂 claude.ai HTML artifact 开发,快速初始化 React + Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui 项目并打包为单文件 HTML,适合需要状态管理、路由或多组件交互的页面。

在 claude.ai 里做复杂网页 Artifact 很省心,多组件、状态和路由都能顺手搭起来,React、Tailwind 与 shadcn/ui 组合效率高、成品也更精致。

编码与调试
未扫描124.4k

前端设计

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向组件、页面、海报和 Web 应用开发,按鲜明视觉方向生成可直接落地的前端代码与高质感 UI,适合做 landing page、Dashboard 或美化现有界面,避开千篇一律的 AI 审美。

想把页面做得既能上线又有设计感,就用前端设计:组件到整站都能产出,难得的是能避开千篇一律的 AI 味。

编码与调试
未扫描124.4k

网页应用测试

by anthropics

Universal
热门

用 Playwright 为本地 Web 应用编写自动化测试,支持启动开发服务器、校验前端交互、排查 UI 异常、抓取截图与浏览器日志,适合调试动态页面和回归验证。

借助 Playwright 一站式验证本地 Web 应用前端功能,调 UI 时还能同步查看日志和截图,定位问题更快。

编码与调试
未扫描124.4k

相关 MCP 服务

GitHub

编辑精选

by GitHub

热门

GitHub 是 MCP 官方参考服务器,让 Claude 直接读写你的代码仓库和 Issues。

这个参考服务器解决了开发者想让 AI 安全访问 GitHub 数据的问题,适合需要自动化代码审查或 Issue 管理的团队。但注意它只是参考实现,生产环境得自己加固安全。

编码与调试
84.6k

by Context7

热门

Context7 是实时拉取最新文档和代码示例的智能助手,让你告别过时资料。

它能解决开发者查找文档时信息滞后的问题,特别适合快速上手新库或跟进更新。不过,依赖外部源可能导致偶尔的数据延迟,建议结合官方文档使用。

编码与调试
53.8k

by tldraw

热门

tldraw 是让 AI 助手直接在无限画布上绘图和协作的 MCP 服务器。

这解决了 AI 只能输出文本、无法视觉化协作的痛点——想象让 Claude 帮你画流程图或白板讨论。最适合需要快速原型设计或头脑风暴的开发者。不过,目前它只是个基础连接器,你得自己搭建画布应用才能发挥全部潜力。

编码与调试
46.6k

评论