go-code-review

by anderskev

Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design. Covers generics (Go 1.18+), errors.Join and slog (Go 1.21+), and Go 1.22 loop variable semantics.

3.7k编码与调试未扫描2026年3月30日

安装

claude skill add --url https://github.com/openclaw/skills

文档

Go Code Review

Review Workflow

Follow this sequence to avoid false positives and catch version-specific issues:

  1. Check go.mod — Note the Go version. This determines which patterns apply (loop variable capture is only an issue pre-1.22, slog is available from 1.21, errors.Join from 1.20). Skip version-gated checks that don't apply.
  2. Scan changed files — Read full functions, not just diffs. Many Go bugs hide in what surrounds the change.
  3. Check each category — Work through the checklist below, loading references as needed.
  4. Verify before reporting — Load beagle-go:review-verification-protocol before submitting findings.

Output Format

Report findings as:

text
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Missing error checks, wrapping, errors.Joinreferences/error-handling.md
Race conditions, channel misuse, goroutine lifecyclereferences/concurrency.md
Interface pollution, naming, genericsreferences/interfaces.md
Resource leaks, defer misuse, slog, namingreferences/common-mistakes.md

Review Checklist

Error Handling

  • All errors checked (no _ = err without justifying comment)
  • Errors wrapped with context (fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err))
  • errors.Is/errors.As used instead of string matching
  • errors.Join used for aggregating multiple errors (Go 1.20+)
  • Zero values returned alongside errors

Concurrency

  • No goroutine leaks (context cancellation or shutdown signal exists)
  • Channels closed by sender only, exactly once
  • Shared state protected by mutex or sync types
  • WaitGroups used to wait for goroutine completion
  • Context propagated through call chain
  • Loop variable capture handled (pre-Go 1.22 codebases only)

Interfaces and Types

  • Interfaces defined by consumers, not producers
  • Interface names follow -er convention
  • Interfaces minimal (1-3 methods)
  • Concrete types returned from constructors
  • any preferred over interface{} (Go 1.18+)
  • Generics used where appropriate instead of any or code generation

Resources and Lifecycle

  • Resources closed with defer immediately after creation
  • HTTP response bodies always closed
  • No defer in loops without closure wrapping
  • init() functions avoided in favor of explicit initialization

Naming and Style

  • Exported names have doc comments
  • No stuttering names (user.UserServiceuser.Service)
  • No naked returns in functions > 5 lines
  • Context passed as first parameter
  • slog used over log for structured logging (Go 1.21+)

Severity Calibration

Critical (Block Merge)

  • Unchecked errors on I/O, network, or database operations
  • Goroutine leaks (no shutdown path)
  • Race conditions on shared state (concurrent map access without sync)
  • Unbounded resource accumulation (defer in loop, unclosed connections)

Major (Should Fix)

  • Errors returned without context (bare return err)
  • Missing WaitGroup for spawned goroutines
  • panic for recoverable errors
  • Context not propagated to downstream calls

Minor (Consider Fixing)

  • interface{} instead of any in Go 1.18+ codebases
  • Missing doc comments on exports
  • Stuttering names
  • Slice not preallocated when size is known

Informational (Note Only)

  • Suggestions to add generics where code generation exists
  • Refactoring ideas for interface design
  • Performance optimizations without measured impact

When to Load References

  • Reviewing error return patterns → error-handling.md
  • Reviewing goroutines, channels, or sync types → concurrency.md
  • Reviewing type definitions, interfaces, or generics → interfaces.md
  • General review (resources, naming, init, performance) → common-mistakes.md

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are acceptable Go patterns — reporting them wastes developer time:

  • _ = err with reason comment — Intentionally ignored errors with explanation
  • Empty interface / any — For truly generic code or interop with untyped APIs
  • Naked returns in short functions — Acceptable in functions < 5 lines with named returns
  • Channel without close — When consumer stops via context cancellation, not channel close
  • Mutex protecting struct fields — Even if accessed only via methods, this is correct encapsulation
  • //nolint directives with reason — Acceptable when accompanied by explanation
  • Defer in loop — When function scope cleanup is intentional (e.g., processing files in batches)
  • Functional options patterntype Option func(*T) with With* constructors is idiomatic
  • sync.Pool for hot paths — Acceptable for reducing allocation pressure in performance-critical code
  • context.Background() in main/tests — Valid root context for top-level calls
  • select with default — Non-blocking channel operation, intentional pattern
  • Short variable names in small scopei, err, ctx, ok are idiomatic Go

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag these issues when the specific conditions apply:

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Missing error checkError return is actionable (can retry, log, or propagate)
Goroutine leakNo context cancellation path exists for the goroutine
Missing deferResource isn't explicitly closed before next acquisition or return
Interface pollutionInterface has > 1 method AND only one consumer exists
Loop variable capturego.mod specifies Go < 1.22
Missing sloggo.mod specifies Go >= 1.21 AND code uses log package for structured output

Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.

相关 Skills

前端设计

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向组件、页面、海报和 Web 应用开发,按鲜明视觉方向生成可直接落地的前端代码与高质感 UI,适合做 landing page、Dashboard 或美化现有界面,避开千篇一律的 AI 审美。

想把页面做得既能上线又有设计感,就用前端设计:组件到整站都能产出,难得的是能避开千篇一律的 AI 味。

编码与调试
未扫描109.6k

网页构建器

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向复杂 claude.ai HTML artifact 开发,快速初始化 React + Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui 项目并打包为单文件 HTML,适合需要状态管理、路由或多组件交互的页面。

在 claude.ai 里做复杂网页 Artifact 很省心,多组件、状态和路由都能顺手搭起来,React、Tailwind 与 shadcn/ui 组合效率高、成品也更精致。

编码与调试
未扫描109.6k

网页应用测试

by anthropics

Universal
热门

用 Playwright 为本地 Web 应用编写自动化测试,支持启动开发服务器、校验前端交互、排查 UI 异常、抓取截图与浏览器日志,适合调试动态页面和回归验证。

借助 Playwright 一站式验证本地 Web 应用前端功能,调 UI 时还能同步查看日志和截图,定位问题更快。

编码与调试
未扫描109.6k

相关 MCP 服务

GitHub

编辑精选

by GitHub

热门

GitHub 是 MCP 官方参考服务器,让 Claude 直接读写你的代码仓库和 Issues。

这个参考服务器解决了开发者想让 AI 安全访问 GitHub 数据的问题,适合需要自动化代码审查或 Issue 管理的团队。但注意它只是参考实现,生产环境得自己加固安全。

编码与调试
82.9k

by Context7

热门

Context7 是实时拉取最新文档和代码示例的智能助手,让你告别过时资料。

它能解决开发者查找文档时信息滞后的问题,特别适合快速上手新库或跟进更新。不过,依赖外部源可能导致偶尔的数据延迟,建议结合官方文档使用。

编码与调试
51.5k

by tldraw

热门

tldraw 是让 AI 助手直接在无限画布上绘图和协作的 MCP 服务器。

这解决了 AI 只能输出文本、无法视觉化协作的痛点——想象让 Claude 帮你画流程图或白板讨论。最适合需要快速原型设计或头脑风暴的开发者。不过,目前它只是个基础连接器,你得自己搭建画布应用才能发挥全部潜力。

编码与调试
46.2k

评论