io.github.sachitrafa/cognitive-ai-memory

编码与调试

by sachitrafa

为 Claude 提供基于艾宾浩斯遗忘曲线的持久记忆,记忆会随时间衰减并在回忆时增强。

什么是 io.github.sachitrafa/cognitive-ai-memory

为 Claude 提供基于艾宾浩斯遗忘曲线的持久记忆,记忆会随时间衰减并在回忆时增强。

README

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.sachitrafa/yourmemory --> <div align="center"> <img src="logo.svg.png" alt="YourMemory" width="110" /><br> <h1>YourMemory</h1>

Your AI has the memory of a goldfish. Not anymore.

Persistent, self-improving memory for AI agents — built on the science of how humans remember.

PyPI PyPI Downloads Python License: CC BY-NC 4.0 GitHub Stars

LoCoMo Recall@5 LongMemEval Recall@5 HotpotQA BOTH@5 MCP Native

<br>

▶ Try the live interactive demo · Website · Benchmarks

</div>

The problem

Every morning your AI agent treats you like a stranger. Same context re-explained. Same preferences forgotten. Every session starts from zero.

Most "memory" tools bolt a vector database onto an agent and call it done — but that's just storage. It hoards every near-duplicate until retrieval drowns in noise. A goldfish with a bigger bowl.

YourMemory is different: memory that works like a brain, not a database.

mermaid
flowchart LR
    A["🧠 You tell your<br/>AI something"] --> B["Extract durable<br/>facts"]
    B --> C["Dedup + embed<br/>+ graph-link"]
    C --> D[("Memory<br/>store")]
    D -->|"related facts pile up"| E["✨ Consolidate<br/>N → 1 summary"]
    D -->|"stale + unused"| F["📉 Decay<br/>+ prune"]
    D -->|"new session"| G["♻️ Recall<br/>hybrid + graph"]
    E --> D
    G --> H["🤖 Your agent<br/>picks up where<br/>it left off"]
    style D fill:#0a2540,stroke:#19cdff,color:#fff
    style E fill:#0c2b3a,stroke:#5eead4,color:#fff
    style H fill:#0c2b3a,stroke:#19cdff,color:#fff

✨ What makes it different

FeatureWhat it does
🧠ConsolidationWhen enough related facts accumulate, they're compressed into one clean summary and the originals are archived. Memory gets sharper over time, not bloated.
📉Biological decayEvery memory ages on an Ebbinghaus forgetting curve. Stale, unused facts fade; important and frequently-recalled ones persist.
🔗Entity graphMemories link by shared people, places, and concepts — so recall surfaces what you forgot to ask for.
♻️Survives context resetsWhen the context window compacts, YourMemory hands the working context back — no re-reading files to figure out where you were.
🔒Tamper-evident audit trailEvery read / write / delete is logged in a hash-chained ledger. Alter one record and the chain breaks.
👥Team memory poolsRole-based shared memory, so a whole team's agents draw on the same institutional knowledge — with private memories kept private.
🛡️Data rights built inOne-command export (right to access) and right-to-forget (purge), plus SOC 2-aligned controls.
🔌MCP-native & local-firstWorks with Claude, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, or any MCP client. Runs entirely on your machine — no API key, nothing leaves your system.

One command to install. DuckDB by default (zero setup), Postgres + pgvector for teams.


Table of Contents


🏆 Benchmarks

Three external datasets. Every number independently reproducible — benchmark code lives in the repo. Full methodology in BENCHMARKS.md.

LoCoMo-10 — multi-session conversational memory

mermaid
xychart-beta
    title "Recall@5 · LoCoMo-10 (higher is better)"
    x-axis ["Mem0", "Zep Cloud", "Supermemory", "YourMemory"]
    y-axis "Recall@5 percent" 0 --> 70
    bar [18, 28, 31, 59]

2× better recall than Zep Cloud across all 10 samples. *Supermemory and Mem0 exhausted free-tier quotas mid-benchmark; scores computed over the full 1,534 pairs.

LongMemEval-S — 500 questions, ~53 distractor sessions each

The hardest standard benchmark for long-term memory. Each question is buried in ~53 sessions.

MetricScore
Recall@5 (any gold session in top-5)89.4%
Recall-all@5 (all gold sessions in top-5)84.8%
nDCG@5 (ranking quality)87.4%

HotpotQA — 200 multi-hop questions

SystemBOTH_FOUND@5
YourMemory (vector + BM25 + entity graph)71.5%
YourMemory (no entity edges)59.5%

Entity graph edges add +12 pp — they traverse from Fact 1 to Fact 2 even when Fact 2 has low embedding similarity to the query.

Writeup: I built memory decay for AI agents using the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve


🚀 Quick Start

Python 3.11–3.14. No Docker, no database setup. All memory stored locally in ~/.yourmemory/.

bash
pip install yourmemory
yourmemory-register <your-token>
yourmemory-setup

Get your token: visit yourmemoryai.xyz → enter your email → verify with a 6-digit code → copy your token.

yourmemory-setup auto-detects and wires up Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and Cline, then asks which backend to use:

  • DuckDB — zero setup, single local file (default)
  • Postgres — shared / production; you provide a DATABASE_URL (needs the pgvector extension)

Optional — smarter local extraction: YourMemory works out of the box with built-in heuristics. For higher-quality, fully-local fact extraction, install Ollama and yourmemory-setup pulls the model (qwen2.5:7b, ~4.7 GB) automatically. Prefer the cloud? Set YOURMEMORY_EXTRACT_BACKEND=anthropic.

Or install from a binary — no Python required

Prefer not to touch pip? Grab the standalone binary for your platform from the latest release:

PlatformAsset
macOS (Apple Silicon)yourmemory-macos-arm64.tar.gz
macOS (Intel)yourmemory-macos-x86_64.tar.gz
Linux (x86-64)yourmemory-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
Windows (x86-64)yourmemory-windows-x86_64.exe.zip
bash
# macOS / Linux — download, extract, run
tar -xzf yourmemory-macos-arm64.tar.gz
./yourmemory-macos-arm64 register <your-token>
./yourmemory-macos-arm64 setup
./yourmemory-macos-arm64            # start the server

One executable handles every command: register, setup, ask "<question>", path, and (with no args) starts the server.

Fully self-contained & offline — the binary bundles Python, every dependency, and both ML models (the embedding model + spaCy). Nothing is downloaded on first run. The trade-off is size (~2 GB). Build your own with a single command — ./build-binary.sh — and multi-platform release binaries are produced automatically by the build workflow.


🧠 How Memory Works

YourMemory treats memory as a living system — it grows, consolidates, forgets, and connects, the way a brain does.

Consolidation — N → 1

Most memory tools just keep growing. YourMemory watches for clusters of related facts and, once enough accumulate, compresses them into a single clean summary — archiving the originals (never deleting, so nothing is lost).

mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph before [Related facts pile up]
        A1["Railway uses Nixpacks"]
        A2["Railway on Pro plan"]
        A3["Railway env vars hold<br/>the Postgres URL"]
        A4["Deploys on Railway<br/>with Postgres"]
    end
    before --> C{"cluster +<br/>LLM summarize"}
    C --> S["✨ Summary<br/>Deploys on Railway (Pro,<br/>Nixpacks) with Postgres<br/>via env vars"]
    C -.->|"archived, recoverable"| ARC[("archive")]
    style S fill:#0a2540,stroke:#5eead4,color:#fff
    style C fill:#0c2b3a,stroke:#19cdff,color:#fff

Real example from one production store: 444 memories → 16 summaries — same knowledge, a fraction of the noise. Consolidation is event-driven (triggered when related memories pile up), not a blind nightly job.

Decay — the forgetting curve

Memory strength decays exponentially. Importance and recall frequency slow that decay:

code
effective_λ  = base_λ × (1 − importance × 0.8)
strength     = clamp(importance × e^(−effective_λ × active_days) × (1 + recall_count × 0.2), 0, 1)

active_days counts only days you were active — vacations don't cause memory loss. Memories below strength 0.05 are pruned automatically. Each category ages at its own rate:

CategoryHalf-lifeBest for
strategy~38 daysPatterns that worked, architectural decisions
fact~24 daysPreferences, identity, stable knowledge
assumption~19 daysInferred context, uncertain beliefs
failure~11 daysErrors, wrong approaches, environment-specific issues

Chain-aware pruning: a decayed memory is kept alive if any graph neighbour is still strong — load-bearing context survives even when rarely queried directly.

Hybrid Retrieval — Vector + BM25 + Graph

Recall runs in two rounds so it surfaces both what you asked for and what you forgot to ask for:

mermaid
flowchart LR
    Q["query"] --> R1["Vector + BM25<br/>hybrid search"]
    R1 --> R2["Graph expansion<br/>(what you forgot to ask)"]
    R2 --> S["rank by<br/>similarity × strength"]
    S --> OUT["🎯 Ranked memories"]
    style OUT fill:#0a2540,stroke:#19cdff,color:#fff

Subject-aware deduplication runs before every store — it embeds the subject of each sentence so "Sachit uses DuckDB" and "YourMemory uses DuckDB" stay separate (different entities), while "YourMemory uses DuckDB" and "YourMemory stores data in DuckDB" merge (same entity). No hardcoded word lists; generalises to any language.


🔒 Trust & Audit Trail

Enterprises won't let an opaque black box store their data. So every operation — read, write, update, delete, consolidation — is appended to a hash-chained, tamper-evident audit log.

mermaid
flowchart LR
    E0["GENESIS"] --> E1
    subgraph E1 [Event 1]
        H1["row_hash =<br/>sha256(prev + data)"]
    end
    E1 --> E2
    subgraph E2 [Event 2]
        H2["row_hash =<br/>sha256(#1.hash + data)"]
    end
    E2 --> E3
    subgraph E3 [Event 3]
        H3["row_hash =<br/>sha256(#2.hash + data)"]
    end
    E3 --> V{"GET /audit/verify"}
    V -->|chain intact| OK["✅ verified"]
    V -->|any row altered| BAD["❌ chain breaks<br/>at that row"]
    style OK fill:#0a2540,stroke:#5eead4,color:#fff
    style BAD fill:#3a0c14,stroke:#fb7185,color:#fff

Each row records the timestamp, actor user + agent, action, operation, target memory, source (http vs mcp), and the previous row's hash. Change any historical record and verify_chain() pinpoints exactly where the chain broke.

bash
GET  /audit            # browse the trail (filter by user / action / operation)
GET  /audit/verify     # cryptographically verify the chain is untampered
POST /audit/prune      # retention-based cleanup (90-day minimum, never lower)

Audit logging is fail-open — it never blocks a memory operation — and read/list events from the dashboard's own render loop are excluded, so the trail stays signal, not noise.


👥 Team Memory Pools

Give a whole team's agents one shared brain — without leaking anyone's private context. Memories are either shared (visible to the pool) or private (visible only to their owner).

mermaid
flowchart TB
    P(("🧠 Team Pool<br/>shared memory"))
    A["Alice's agent"] <-->|shared| P
    B["Bob's agent"] <-->|shared| P
    C["Carol's agent"] <-->|shared| P
    A -. private .-> AP["🔒 Alice-only"]
    B -. private .-> BP["🔒 Bob-only"]
    style P fill:#0a2540,stroke:#19cdff,color:#fff
    style AP fill:#0c1424,stroke:#5a6b80,color:#8294a8
    style BP fill:#0c1424,stroke:#5a6b80,color:#8294a8

Role-based access is enforced per agent — what one engineer's agent learns, the whole team benefits from instantly; sensitive context stays scoped to its owner.

bash
POST   /pools                          # create a pool
POST   /pools/{id}/members             # add a member (with role)
POST   /pools/{id}/memories            # contribute a shared memory
POST   /pools/{id}/retrieve            # recall across the pool

🛡️ Data Rights & Compliance

Because memory that stores real data needs the controls to be trusted with it:

RightEndpointWhat it does
Access (DSAR export)GET /users/{id}/exportFull export of everything stored for a user
Erasure (right to forget)DELETE /users/{id}/memoriesOne-command purge of a user's memories
PortabilityPOST /users/{id}/importRe-import a previous export
RecoverabilityGET /users/{id}/archiveRetrieve consolidated-away originals

Combined with the hash-chained audit trail and 90-day retention floor, these map directly onto the controls documented in SECURITY.md (SOC 2-aligned).


🎛️ Dashboards

Two built-in browser UIs — no extra setup, they start automatically with the server.

Memory Dashboard — http://localhost:3033/ui

A full read/write view with Memories · Audit · Pools tabs: stats bar (Strong / Fading / Near-prune), per-agent tabs, memory cards with live strength bars, category filters, the audit trail, and pool management.

Graph Visualiser — http://localhost:3033/graph

An interactive force-directed map of how memories connect — root memory as a bright node, neighbours color-coded by category, edge thickness = connection strength. Drag, zoom, and click any node for full content.

code
http://localhost:3033/graph?memoryId=42&userId=alex&depth=2

🔧 MCP Tools

Three tools, called by your AI automatically.

ToolWhen your AI calls itWhat it does
recall_memory(query, current_path?)Start of every taskSurfaces memories ranked by similarity × decay strength; spatial boost for path-matched memories
store_memory(content, importance, category?, context_paths?)After learning something newEmbeds, deduplicates, stores with decay; tags optional file/dir paths
update_memory(id, new_content, importance)When a stored fact is outdatedRe-embeds and replaces; logs the change to the audit trail
python
# Store with spatial context
store_memory(
    "Alex prefers tabs over spaces in Python",
    importance=0.9, category="fact",
    context_paths=["/projects/backend"],
)

# Next session — spatial boost fires when working in that directory
recall_memory("Python formatting", current_path="/projects/backend")
# → {"content": "Alex prefers tabs over spaces in Python", "strength": 0.87}

⚡ Ask Without an LLM Call

The only memory system that can answer questions without making any LLM API call:

bash
yourmemory ask "what database does this project use"
# → YourMemory uses DuckDB locally and Postgres in production.

yourmemory ask "how do I fix a kubernetes deployment"
# → Not enough memory context to answer without an LLM.

When memory is strong enough it answers instantly — zero tokens, zero cloud cost, zero latency. When it isn't, it declines cleanly rather than hallucinating. Your query never leaves your machine.


🔀 API Proxy — Guaranteed Memory

MCP tools are called at the AI's discretion. The API proxy removes that uncertainty — it intercepts every LLM call, injects relevant memories automatically, and handles store_memory / update_memory with no model configuration.

Start the server (yourmemory), then point your client at localhost:3033:

python
from anthropic import Anthropic

client = Anthropic(
    api_key="sk-ant-...",
    base_url="http://localhost:3033/proxy/anthropic",
    default_headers={"X-YourMemory-User": "alex"},  # per-user memory
)

# Memory is injected automatically — no other changes needed
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-opus-4-8",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What database do I use?"}],
)

OpenAI works identically via base_url="http://localhost:3033/proxy/openai".


🏗️ Architecture & Stack

mermaid
flowchart LR
    C["Your AI client<br/>Claude · Cursor · any MCP"] <--> Y["🧠 YourMemory"]
    Y --> M[("Memory<br/>store")]
    Y --> A[("Audit<br/>ledger")]
    style Y fill:#0a2540,stroke:#19cdff,color:#fff
    style M fill:#0c1a2c,stroke:#5eead4,color:#fff
    style A fill:#0c1a2c,stroke:#5eead4,color:#fff
ComponentRole
DuckDBDefault vector store — zero setup, native cosine similarity
PostgreSQL + pgvectorOptional — for teams or large datasets
NetworkXDefault graph backend (~/.yourmemory/graph.pkl)
Neo4jOptional graph backend
sentence-transformersLocal embeddings (multi-qa-mpnet-base-dot-v1, 768 dims)
spaCyLocal NLP for deduplication and entity extraction
APSchedulerAutomatic decay + pruning

🩺 Troubleshooting

Writes hang / time out (DuckDB single-writer lock). If both the MCP server and the HTTP server run at once, they compete for the DuckDB write lock. Fix:

bash
pkill -f yourmemory 2>/dev/null || true
rm -f ~/.yourmemory/memories.duckdb.wal ~/.yourmemory/memories.duckdb.lock 2>/dev/null || true
# restart your client

Running Claude Desktop (MCP) and Claude Code (hooks) simultaneously? Use SQLite instead — it handles concurrent readers/writers cleanly: DATABASE_URL=sqlite:///~/.yourmemory/memories.db


🤝 Contributing

PRs welcome — see CONTRIBUTORS.md.

📚 Dataset References

📄 License

Copyright 2026 Sachit Misra — Licensed under CC-BY-NC-4.0.

Free for personal use, education, academic research, and open-source projects. Commercial use requires a separate written agreement → mishrasachit1@gmail.com

<div align="center"><br><b>Give your AI a memory worth keeping.</b><br><code>pip install yourmemory</code></div>

常见问题

io.github.sachitrafa/cognitive-ai-memory 是什么?

为 Claude 提供基于艾宾浩斯遗忘曲线的持久记忆,记忆会随时间衰减并在回忆时增强。

相关 Skills

前端设计

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向组件、页面、海报和 Web 应用开发,按鲜明视觉方向生成可直接落地的前端代码与高质感 UI,适合做 landing page、Dashboard 或美化现有界面,避开千篇一律的 AI 审美。

想把页面做得既能上线又有设计感,就用前端设计:组件到整站都能产出,难得的是能避开千篇一律的 AI 味。

编码与调试
未扫描164.6k

网页应用测试

by anthropics

Universal
热门

用 Playwright 为本地 Web 应用编写自动化测试,支持启动开发服务器、校验前端交互、排查 UI 异常、抓取截图与浏览器日志,适合调试动态页面和回归验证。

借助 Playwright 一站式验证本地 Web 应用前端功能,调 UI 时还能同步查看日志和截图,定位问题更快。

编码与调试
未扫描164.6k

网页构建器

by anthropics

Universal
热门

面向复杂 claude.ai HTML artifact 开发,快速初始化 React + Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui 项目并打包为单文件 HTML,适合需要状态管理、路由或多组件交互的页面。

在 claude.ai 里做复杂网页 Artifact 很省心,多组件、状态和路由都能顺手搭起来,React、Tailwind 与 shadcn/ui 组合效率高、成品也更精致。

编码与调试
未扫描164.6k

相关 MCP Server

GitHub

编辑精选

by GitHub

热门

GitHub 是 MCP 官方参考服务器,让 Claude 直接读写你的代码仓库和 Issues。

这个参考服务器解决了开发者想让 AI 安全访问 GitHub 数据的问题,适合需要自动化代码审查或 Issue 管理的团队。但注意它只是参考实现,生产环境得自己加固安全。

编码与调试
88.1k

by Context7

热门

Context7 是实时拉取最新文档和代码示例的智能助手,让你告别过时资料。

它能解决开发者查找文档时信息滞后的问题,特别适合快速上手新库或跟进更新。不过,依赖外部源可能导致偶尔的数据延迟,建议结合官方文档使用。

编码与调试
58.6k

by tldraw

热门

tldraw 是让 AI 助手直接在无限画布上绘图和协作的 MCP 服务器。

这解决了 AI 只能输出文本、无法视觉化协作的痛点——想象让 Claude 帮你画流程图或白板讨论。最适合需要快速原型设计或头脑风暴的开发者。不过,目前它只是个基础连接器,你得自己搭建画布应用才能发挥全部潜力。

编码与调试
49.4k

评论